Verizon // Lunar New Year Promotion BTS

Well we’ve had some pretty cool opportunities come up here lately. One of which was the opportunity to film for Verizon in San Francisco.

To celebrate Lunar New Year, Verizon threw a concert in Union Square featuring a bunch of Youtube artists including: Jayne Rio, David So, Nicki Sun, New Heights, Jason Chen, and Kina Grannis. At the same time they ran a “Lucky Bag” promotion which they wanted to showcase in a quick, 30 second web spot. Here’s the link:

What was cool for me was that we got to take our entire team of four (Matt, Jane, Jason, and myself) along for the entire trip. Here’s some behind the scenes shots of us in action!

Thanks for stopping by! More adventures to come!



3 thoughts on “Verizon // Lunar New Year Promotion BTS

  1. It was so wonderful getting to work with your team! Words cannot describe how deeply impressed I was with the quality of work and timeliness for these past two Verizon events . Above all, I am so incredibly blessed to know another team of talented individuals and cannot wait to work with ya’ll again ❤ BAY AREA LOVE!!

  2. DMV DUI Charm Options

    The target of a San Diego DUI lawyer is to current at the
    California DMV management hearing. If DMV upholds the suspension activity, unless
    the driver is eligible for a limited driving privilege, the DMV Handbook explains these two “appeal” options readily available to
    the lawyer: (1) Department Review as well as (2) High court Testimonial–
    a civil suit through a request for writ of mandamus


    If the driver is not encouraged of the decision at the end of the hearing, tell them the decision
    will be forwarded quickly. Inform the vehicle driver if the Notice of Searchings for as well as Decision (DS.
    2358) suggests a negative decision, it additionally states they have a right to a department and.
    court testimonial.

    If the motorist is alerted of a negative decisionat the verdict of the hearing, notify the.
    person of their allure civil liberties and fasten the created request (DS 2426, or blank paper) to the.
    data. The department evaluation charge of $120 shall accompany the request for an evaluation. The.
    individual data, listening to disk, request for department evaluation, documentary evidence, as well as.
    searchings for of simple fact are sent out to the headquarters’ Vehicle driver Security Appeals System (DSAU) where.
    the departmental assessment is conducted. DSAU concerns the order and updates the driving.

    An exception to sending the data, etc., to the DSAU is when an intelligible and also complete .
    audio recording of the hearing is unavailable. In this situation, speak with management to.
    decide whether the case needs to be resumed or alloted, relying on the timeliness of.
    the action, the day the hearing was held, and also when the motorist was notified of the results.
    of the hearing. (The denoted types lie in Appendix A.).

    KEEP IN MIND: The $120 fee does not put on a request for a departmental review of any kind of.
    various other hearing kind, consisting of hearings carried out according to § 13353.1 VC,.
    PAS or various other Chemical Test Rejection Under Age 21.


    Under § 13559 VC, a vehicle driver who has actually obtained a notification preserving an APS suspension or.
    abrogation could submit a request (Writ of Mandate) in the high court of the vehicle driver’s.
    resident region, to have the order evaluated. The court’s assessment is based upon the.
    department’s hearing document just, without any consideration of various other evidence.

    The declaring has to be within 90 if the motorist’s instance has actually been evaluated by the division.
    days of obtaining the division’s choice, as well as does not stay the suspension or.
    revocation activity. If the motorist’s instance has not been reviewed by the department, the.
    applying for court evaluation should be within 30 days from the mailing day of the Notification of.

    A searching for by the court under this section has no collateral estoppel result on a.
    succeeding prosecution as well as does not preclude litigation of those very same realities in.
    the criminal proceeding.”.

    [DMV Motorist Health Guidebook, Chapter 12, APS Hearings, web pages 12-80 as well as 12-81]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s